Apr 23





Microsoft rolls out its Dynamics CRM Online package with prices and options aimed at undercutting software-as-a-service leader Salesforce.com.

By John Pallatto

Playing catch-up in the on-demand customer relationship management market, Microsoft announced the general availability of Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online with aggressive pricing and data storage options that seek to take business away from Salesforce.com.

Dynamics CRM Online is a full suite of on-demand sales, marketing and customer service applications along with business process automation and workflow automation, said Bill Patterson, Microsoft’s director of product management for the online CRM package.

To try to entice Salesforce.com customers to switch to Dynamics CRM Online, Microsoft is undercutting Salesforce.com’s prices and offering more data storage capacity.

Microsoft is offering its on-demand CRM package in two editions. The Professional Edition offers 5GB of data storage, 100 configurable workflows and 100 custom entities at an introductory price of $39 per user per month through the end of 2008. The regular price after that is $44 per user per month. More details on pricing and options are available at Microsoft’s Dynamics CRM Online Web site.

The Professional Plus Edition provides offline data synchronization along with 20GB of data storage, 200 configurable entities and 100 custom entities. This package is priced at $59 per user per month.

In contrast, Salesforce.com’s Professional Edition costs $65 per user per month and provides 1GB of storage.

More than 500 organizations have been using the product for nearly eight months as part of an early release program, Patterson said.

“For some of these businesses this is their first CRM system; for others, they are replacing other CRM investments such as Salesforce.com” and Oracle’s Siebel CRM On Demand package, Patterson said. Interest in the Microsoft product isn’t limited to small and midsize businesses, he said, but departments and divisions within large enterprises are also showing an interest.

Patterson said the average deployment size is about 15 seats per customer but some of the larger sales in the pipeline are averaging about 27 seats per customer.

Microsoft has also been working with about 300 VARs on the product introduction and about 150 ISVs that are building industry vertical applications that run on top of CRM Online or software that integrates CRM Online with other applications.

Continue Pg 2 >

 

Microsoft Prices CRM Online to Undercut Rivals

Mar 18





By Peter Piazza

Microsoft is directly challenging Salesforce.com with its new hosted CRM service, which is in beta testing now and should be launched for general sign-up in the middle of this year. All indications are that Microsoft will launch a full-scale attack, with extremely aggressive pricing: Salesforce.com’s similar offerings cost about 50 percent more.

Microsoft offered a sneak peek of the newest version of its CRM application, Dynamics AX 2009, at Convergence 2008, a meeting of Microsoft Dynamics users. The release, due in the first half of this year, is aimed at small and midsize businesses with what analysts say is extremely aggressive pricing.

One major focus of the new release is managing compliance obligations, providing what Microsoft calls a “one-stop shop for compliance-related information.” AX 2009 also includes enhanced global capabilities (such as multiple language support) that will give international businesses real-time visibility into operations such as overseas inventory of global locations.

Chris Alliegro, lead analyst with Directions on Microsoft (an independent research firm focused exclusively on Microsoft strategy and technology), said that Dynamics offers a big advantage over competing products: a familiar interface. “If you’re a Microsoft shop, it’s an interface you’re already familiar with. Having your CRM functionality visible, accessible, and built into Outlook is a huge selling point for Microsoft.”

Salesforce.com: The One To Beat

Alliegro told us that Microsoft is directly challenging Salesforce.com with its new hosted CRM service, which is in beta testing now and should be launched for general sign-up in the middle of this year. All indications are that Microsoft will launch a full-scale attack.

“They’re coming at the market very aggressively,” particularly in terms of pricing, Alliegro said. One version of the hosted product is expected to be $44 per month per subscriber, and $15 higher for the more enhanced version. (The main differences between the two versions, he said, are storage amount and the ability to support offline synchronizations.) He said that Salesforce.com’s similar offerings cost about 50 percent more.

“It’s fair to ask if Microsoft can even make money at that price point. That’s something they’re going to learn. I think that companies getting into this kind of business are caught off-guard by how small the margins actually are — it’s a much smaller-margin business than selling packaged software,” Alliegro said.

But Microsoft has both the deep pockets and the staying power needed to compete. “Microsoft is the kind of company that has proved that if it believes in something, it’s willing to lose money on it for a long time to win the market, and they’re a company that’s as well positioned as any company to operate in that kind of environment,” Alliegro said.

The Future of xRM

Alliegro noted that Microsoft has been talking up the idea of “xRM,” where its CRM platform can have far more uses than simply managing sales, customer service and marketing. “It’s also a generic platform that can be tailored to a wide range of functions or applications that are managing relations,” Alliegro said. For example, the U.S. Air Force used the platform to build an application to help them manage personnel deployment — which is not a customer-service application.

Microsoft will be looking hard at ways to exploit xRM and find other uses — and customers — for it. “They haven’t said anything about what that functionality might be, but they hinted that they’re thinking about that. If Microsoft starts to work through the feature specs of the next version, it wouldn’t surprise me to see other functional domain areas surfacing, where they’re taking this product and trying to make it specific to some applications other than strictly CRM.”

CRM Daily | Microsoft CRM Takes on Salesforce.com

Feb 26





Microsoft launched a takeover bid on Feb. 1 of $31 per share in cash and stock, a 62 percent premium over Yahoo’s previous day’s closing price. A New York Times article cited Michael Cusumano, professor at the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, suggesting that Microsoft should instead use the M&A strategies of SAP rival Oracle as an example.

By Tyler Sitte

Shares in SAP (NYSE: SAP)  were lower in morning trade as dealers said talk about possible future acquisitions for the software manufacturer was offsetting merger and acquisition speculation concerning the unlikely takeover from software giant Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT)  .

“Jitters about a possible expensive takeover by the software company are helping to put pressure on its shares,” said a Frankfurt-based trader.

He said the jitters were offsetting a report in this Sunday’s New York Times that Microsoft is going after the wrong target, with its takeover attempt of Yahoo (Nasdaq: YHOO) , and it should instead try to buy SAP.

Integration, Then Negotiation

In an interview with the Handelsblatt newspaper, SAP chief executive Henning Kagermann said the company is open for any further acquisitions but it would first have to integrate Business Objects before looking around for any further deals.

In late-morning trading, shares in SAP were 0.06 Euros, or 0.18 percent, lower at 32.45 euros (US$48.12), making it the third worst performer on the DAX, which was down 112.91 points or 1.66 percent at 6,919.20.

Microsoft launched a takeover bid on Feb. 1 of $31 per share in cash and stock, a 62 percent premium over Yahoo’s previous day’s closing price.

Follow Oracle’s Lead?

The New York Times article cited Michael Cusumano, professor at the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology , suggesting that Microsoft should instead use the M&A strategies of SAP rival Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL)  as an example and “should acquire another major player in business software, merging Microsoft’s strength with that of another.”

“It’s not an outlandish idea,” the report said.

“The two companies held merger talks in late 2003, and perhaps since then, too. Microsoft is in an enviable position: It is a nearly universal presence in corporate data centers, and large enterprise customers are arguably the best customers a software company can have.”

“This all sounds very interesting,” said a local trader in response to the article, “but the stock is really not reacting on the news.”

Technorati Tags: ,,

CRM News: Deals: SAP Called Better Target Than Yahoo for Microsoft

Jan 22





CRM News: Customer Data: Getting Creepy With Your Data
By Erika Morphy

“Some of Microsoft’s latest moves have a distinct ‘Big Brother’ feel,” wrote blogger Ann All. “There’s its application for a patent on a system that would allow managers to monitor workers’ physiological states through their computers — ostensibly to offer help to folks when they become frustrated. And then there’s the partnership with MediaCart Holdings that promises to serve up advertisements geared to the position of a shopper’s grocery cart in the store.”

Customers’ privacy and their data are two immutable and opposing forces that a company must always try to balance, usually unsuccessfully. Few for-profit firms have proven themselves able to resist the lure of monetizing their customers’ and users’ data.

Some consumer advocates have put up a good fight in keeping such privacy intrusions to a minimum. Still, though, laws outlining the proper use of customer data to protect against identity theft as well as to protect against predators are still, in many cases, stalled in the legislative process, says Kathryn C. Montgomery, a professor at American University Latest News about American University and author of a chapter in the MacArthur Series on Digital Media and Learning: Civic Engagement. That is why a public debate on these issues are always welcome, she told CRM Buyer.

Meanwhile, however, it seems as though companies are one step ahead of lawmakers and even advocacy hawks, developing programs using customer data that go far beyond what a customer ever envisioned when she agreed to do business with the company.

Microsoft Gets Creepy

One recent blog by Ann All, that she titled the “Visible Enterprise,” describes how some companies are crossing the border from cool to creepy.

She singles out Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) Webroot AntiSpyware 30-Day Free Trial. Click here. Latest News about Microsoft — although giving a nod to Google’s (Nasdaq: GOOG) Latest News about Google creds as being the company most likely to violate your privacy.

That said, however, “some of Microsoft’s latest moves have a distinct ‘Big Brother’ feel,” she wrote. “There’s its application for a patent on a system that would allow managers to monitor workers’ physiological states through their computers (ostensibly to offer help to folks when they become frustrated). And then there’s the partnership with MediaCart Holdings that promises to serve up advertisements geared to the position of a shopper’s grocery cart in the store.”

She describes as “creepiest” a Microsoft initiative, in which “sensors gather information about customers as they move through a store. Then the info is analyzed, a customer profile is generated, and targeted advertisements are presented to the customer as he strolls throughout the store.”

How Necessary?

All concludes by wondering how necessary such programs are in the first place. Retail loyalty programs, she wrote, would have more value if companies would do a better job at collecting, analyzing and managing their data. Her son is 7, and All still receives coupons for diapers and baby supplies. “I wish my grocer would tweak its underlying business processes to offer me more relevant ads — but not so relevant that it creeps me out.”

As it happens it will take more than a “tweak” for All’s grocer to be able to offer her relevant adds. Prediction and forecasting technology used by retailers to not only guess what their markets and customers will do but also make the best offer in anticipation of that behavior has been woefully short of the mark.

Technology has not always delivered as promised in this sector, Sheryl Kingstone, a Yankee Group analyst, told CRM Buyer. The good news is that it has improved to such an extent over the last year that the line of business user is able to easily leverage it.

The bad news — from an industry perspective — she said, is that most firms are still using traditional analytics, such as what a customer bought in the past, where and in what quantities, to determine the offer it will make to that customer in the future.” It’s not the most effective way to come to these decisions, she said. And as All pointed out, it’s kind of creepy.

Community Strength

Will Price discusses these problems in his post “Subprime failure and prediction markets,” which starts out by asking the intriguing question: “What do the subprime meltdown and Iraq have in common?” The answer: “Massive failure due to forecast errors.”

The inability for business or government to forecast accurately, however, is not limited to these grandiose failures, he wrote. “Examples … are legion — product ship dates, sales forecasts, demand forecasts, value-at-risk models, elections, stock price predictions, etc.”

We will never be able to predict the future, Price concluded. “However, all of us should consider how we can open up our decision making processes to allow for non-biased, comprehensive input that allows the wisdom of our organizations to weigh in on key decisions - better inputs enable better capital and resource allocation decisions and can help avoid disaster.”

His answer? Leveraging the tacit or explicit wisdom of a community. “Prediction markets are needed to help unlock the tacit knowledge of organizations and to lessen the colossal forecast errors now reverberating through our economy.”

Tom Elrod applied Price’s ruminations to the limitations of CRM tools, in his post, “Forecasting beyond the pipeline.”

“While many of these companies using a CRM are able to produce short term forecasting based off of the immediate sales pipeline, they often have little or no way to forecast beyond it,” he wrote. “The main reason for this is that they usually don’t have the data needed and when they do, no way to analyze that data for predictability.”

Elrod’s answer to the problem was part internal ingenuity and part a call for better tools. He uses as an example a company that has figured out that 90 percent of its sales came from leads that visited its web site at least four times within six weeks of becoming a lead within the CRM application. “Given this indicator of sales, you can start predicting sales from web traffic. For example, if know that have 25 companies who have visited your web site more than 4 times within the last 6 weeks, then forecast a revenue of $562.5K in 3.5 months.

There are a number of data points correlating web traffic patterns to sales patterns that can be used to help forecast future sales, he wrote. The key is to be able to derive these correlations based on historic sales information. “Having a tool that automatically ties web traffic patterns to consequential sales opportunities also helps.

Development Tips

Developer Jane Mantilla offers a few development tips for code customizations for Microsoft CRM 4.0.

“Why am I talking about code customizations and not just customizations?” she wrote. “Well just because in CRM you can do a lot without a single line of code… and this time I want especially to talk about the code customizations.”

Technorati Tags: , ,

Dec 18





Solution Providers Aboard SAAS Bandwagon
By Jessica Davis

Most Microsoft partners view SAAS as an opportunity, not a threat.

Solution providers view software as a service as a big opportunity that has the potential to change the way business is done.

That is according to a forthcoming study from market research firm IDC, “Channel View: SAAS Capabilities and Opportunities.”

The study surveyed just over 300 businesses made up of members of the
IAMCP (International Association of Microsoft Certified Partners,) an
independent organization, and also partners at an unnamed major IT
distributor.

IDC reported that 76 percent of solution providers who responded
believe that SAAS will dramatically impact the partnering landscape,
and more than 70 percent of solution providers view it as an
opportunity.
“I had expected partners to be positive, but the extent of the optimism
was very encouraging to me,” said Stephen Graham, group vice president
of Software Business Strategies at IDC.

Many solution provider firms are already engaged in
SAAS-related activities, according to IDC. And solution providers
believe that the most profitable opportunities related to SAAS will
remain deployments and implementation services. But solution providers
are also looking forward to the recurring revenue opportunity that
comes with the SAAS business model, according to IDC.

The firm also expects more vendors to take up the SAAS flag next year.

In 2008 several major vendors and their respective solution
provider ecosystems will be entering the SAAS space or ratcheting up
their participation in it, Graham said. Vendors to watch include SAP,
Microsoft, Cisco Systems and IBM, he said.

One of the vendors looking to help solution providers leverage
the new opportunities is Microsoft. The company’s Solution Finder tool
helps customers and solution providers find other solution providers,
and Microsoft expects its partners to use the tool to help with SAAS
projects.

“Partners will increasingly be working together to be able to
offer these kinds of solutions,” said Marie Huwe, a general manager
with the Microsoft Partner organization in charge of worldwide partner
and marketing strategy. “By partnering with each other there’s more
opportunity for the channel to cross geographies.”

IDC conducts a similar survey every six months looking at different channel issues. The last survey looked at partner-to-partner collaboration trends.

eweek Article

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

« Previous Entries