Apr 17





NetSuite has found a sweet spot for its on-demand business management software. Today, the company introduced OneWorld, which adds real-time management and consolidation capabilities for companies that are multinational or have multiple subsidiaries.

Posted by Dan Farber

Targeting midsize companies, OneWorld is the biggest architectural change to NetSuite since its inception, according to company CEO Zach Nelson. “Within a single instance, you can effectively run multiple companies in real time. The subsidiaries have complete local control that automatically consolidates into any hierarchy they have in real time,” he told me.

“OneWorld enables our customers to run their global businesses in real time with the click of the button,” Nelson said during the launch event in San Francisco. It solves the “hairball” problem, he explained. Companies with global businesses don’t have to cobble together data from different vendors and applications to get a consolidated P&L or sales forecast across countries or subsidiaries.

So far, NetSuite has 32 customers running OneWorld. The software supports 170 currencies, but local tax codes are pre-configured only for the United States and the United Kingdom, with Japan expected to be added by mid-year, Nelson said.

 

OneWorld allows users to function locally but to have real-time visibility into the big picture

(Credit: NetSuite)

 NetSuite OneWorld offers a compelling solution–less costly and simpler to deploy–for the “flat” world of business in the cloud computing era. Priced at $1,999 per month in the U.S., OneWorld applies across all the NetSuite modules, including accounting/ERP, CRM, and e-commerce. For example, the NetSuite CRM module can manage multi-currency quotas, forecasts, commission payments, sales taxes, and reporting for each location in their own language and currencies and as a consolidated entity.

Microsoft’s Dynamics GP has some consolidation capabilities, and Oracle’s Hyperion and SAP can consolidate financials across complex multinational and subsidiary hierarchies but at a higher cost than OneWorld, Nelson said.

“Our pricing is cheap if you look at the number of services we are replacing. It would cost $100 million to solve the multinational and multi-subsidiary management and consolidation issue if you implemented SAP on a global scale,” Nelson said. “We see companies trading out their existing ERP systems to get this feature. Switching ERP systems is a big deal, but the price point and functionality is compelling.”

NetSuite is also the only on-demand business suite that offers the multinational and multi-subsidiary consolidation solution, he added. SAP has been developing Business ByDesign for more than four years, with 2,500 developers. It is also targeting midsize companies (100 to 500 employees), and will cover all major industries and functional areas, according to the company. Given SAP’s legacy, it will offer similar consolidation capabilities to NetSuite’s OneWorld. Business ByDesign is still in private beta and is expected to be generally available later this year or early in 2009.

Currently, NetSuite has about 5,600 active customers, with the majority in the U.S. For 2007, NetSuite had $108.5 million in revenue, a 62 percent increase year-over-year. The net loss for the year, on a GAAP basis, was $23.9 million. For 2008, NetSuite is projecting revenue of $153 million to $156 million. OneWorld should help the company meet its goals in its first year as a public company.

NetSuite finds a sweet spot with OneWorld | Outside the Lines - CNET News.com

Mar 4





Small and midsize companies are slowly but surely turning their heads — and business — to software-as-a-service.

By Jessica Tsai

For years now, software-as-a-service (SaaS) has been the little engine that could — and it’s been gaining significant traction as more and more companies are turning to hosted, on-demand solutions, according to a report released today by Access Markets International (AMI) Partners. The report particularly underscores the growing adoption of SaaS among small and midsize businesses (SMBs), revealing that 21 percent of small businesses and 31 percent of midsize ones are using a SaaS model — double the penetration seen in 2004.

The consistent development of SaaS remains “steady” and “incremental,” says Laurie McCabe, vice president of SMB insights and solutions at AMI-Partners. According to the report, SMBs are drawn to SaaS because the technology:

  • is easy to use;
  • is easy to implement and maintain;
  • requires limited infrastructure and technology resources; and
  • is increasingly available.

“There are, truly, many great SaaS solutions out there for SMBs, in almost every application area,” McCabe says. Yet while SaaS technology may be readily available, adoption is hampered by the fact that many businesses still need to be educated about its benefits.

The report states that SaaS adoption among midsize businesses is “significantly outpacing” penetration within the small-business sector — in fact, midsize businesses are, on average, spending about six times more per year than their small-business counterparts are, and they’re twice as likely to report a planned increase in spending in the next 12 months. “Small businesses are typically slower than [midsize] businesses to adopt any new type of technology solution,” McCabe says. “As a group, small businesses tend to be less knowledgeable about what’s available, and more reluctant to try things than [midsize] businesses [are].”

Aside from educating themselves, McCabe argues that there are no legitimate obstacles for smaller businesses looking to acquire a SaaS solution — SaaS is an equal-opportunity model. The initial steps are remarkably simple, McCabe says — and may be just what a small or midsize company needs to get the ball rolling: “Identify the business functions you need a solution for, and ‘google’ that function — such as ‘CRM and SaaS’ — to get an idea of the range of offerings out there,” she advises. “Then try a few and compare.”

In fact, she adds, the most fundamental reason to turn to SaaS in the first place is that it’s “easier to try and use than traditional packaged software.” Furthermore, most SaaS solution providers will give a potential client the option to see its data in a live demo — and some industry wags have noted that any vendor that won’t let you test-drive its software should be immediately removed from consideration.

Growth may be steady but McCabe predicts SaaS will take another three years to become truly accepted by the mainstream. It helps that big-name companies are also taking a dive into the SaaS pool, further extending awareness of the market. And the fact that SaaS solutions are now being peddled by established vendors such as Microsoft and IBM should also help boost confidence.

As of now, the market has yet to ripen. “Our survey indicated that 34 percent of small businesses were not aware of SaaS, and 33 percent didn’t think SaaS was relevant to their business[es],” McCabe laments. As a result, she adds, it remains the vendors’ burden to convey the advantages and practicality of SaaS.

Technorati Tags: ,

destinationCRM.com: SaaS Is As Easy As 1-2-3, A-B-C

Feb 29





The on-demand CRM vendor, recently public, launches an application development platform — NetSuite Business Operating System — for custom and vertical software.

By Marshall Lager

Customizing a CRM system for business in a given vertical industry is time-consuming and difficult to do well, so software-as-a-service (SaaS) CRM vendor NetSuite is allowing the task to be handled by outside software developers. The NetSuite Business Operating System (NS-BOS), announced today, is a SaaS software development platform designed to help developers, independent software vendors (ISVs), and value added resellers (VARs) create industry specific applications targeting vertical markets.

NS-BOS includes:

  • SaaS Infrastructure: Third-party applications will be hosted on NetSuite’s multi-tenant, on-demand architecture.
  • Core Business Management Suite: By including the NetSuite application within the NS-BOS environment, ISVs can focus on adding features designed for specific industries instead of building core application capabilities like accounting, inventory, or order management.
  • SuiteFlex: NetSuite’s technology platform for customer, partner, and development customization, verticalization, and business process automation includes tools and the SuiteScript programming language for creating new applications.
  • SuiteScript D-Bug: NetSuite claims this is the first Platform-as-a-Service code debugger, and is a key component of NS-BOS. It enables real-time code validation and testing against the entire NetSuite application, which can result in faster development.
  • SuiteBundler: This enables the delivery of ISV-built vertical solutions to SaaS customers in a packaged, repeatable manner, rather than recreating the code for each customer.

There is no additional cost for NS-BOS to developers, according to the company. Applications built with NS-BOS that include the NetSuite ERP / CRM / Ecommerce Suite will be priced by the ISV developing the vertical applications, with an agreed-to revenue share with NetSuite for the base suite.

Along with NS-BOS, the company announced the first three vertical customizations built with it:

  • Supply chain management for manufacturers, by SPS Commerce;
  • Integrated CRM and ERP for government contractors, by Daston Corporation; and
  • Total commerce management, automating and integrating key business processes including supply chain management, procurement, competitor monitoring, and pricing, by IntroScape.

Finally, NetSuite has created a new position to oversee the NS-BOS development community. Michael Ni is now the vice president of industry solutions and ecosystem. In this new role, Ni will direct NetSuite’s industry vertical initiatives, software developer programs, and will oversee the continuation of the development of NetSuite as a vertical application platform, according to the company.

“Third-party vertical application developers are struggling to move their client/server applications to the SaaS model, and NS-BOS provides the technology they need to do that quickly,” said Zach Nelson, CEO of NetSuite, in a statement. “But developers need more than just great technology; they also need a new approach to business mandated by the on-demand software approach. Michael has the experience and the skill to take our platform initiatives to the next level and to help our partners transition their business to the Software as a Service model.”

CRM industry analysts expressed approval of NetSuite’s moves. “It’s great to see all of NetSuite’s strategic plans of the past year have been wrapped up within NS-BOS,” says Gretchen Duhaime, senior research analyst with Aberdeen Group. “Vertical solutions are critical to our industry; NetSuite is keeping its focus on the core CRM system while it lets other developers take over the creation of vertical applications where they have the expertise.”

The introduction of NS-BOS has inevitably led to comparisons with rival Salesforce.com’s Force development platform. “Both are addressing the same need,” Duhaime says. “But while Salesforce.com is using third-party developers both for horizontal and vertical functionality, NetSuite is keeping its focus on the core application, which is more complete, and leaving vertical customization to the VARs.”

“It’s a fairly savvy approach, participating in the platform hoo-ha without getting bogged down in vertical development,” agrees Denis Pombriant, founder and managing principal of Beagle Research Group. “NetSuite has a different view of the ISV channel relationship–it’s focused on giving people who want to use one or more core NetSuite applications the ability to get custom-crafted functionality. Salesforce.com is saying ‘Don’t use any of our applications if you don’t want to; here’s the Force platform, you can build your own if you want.”

On a lighter note, both experts expressed amusement over the choice of name for the developer platform. “It sounds a little too much like MS-DOS,” Duhaime says. Pombriant notes that, “Given the orientation toward ‘Suite,’ I figured the name would have reflected that.” He adds that, to him, the name “sounds like a combination of an international airport and a starship.”

destinationCRM.com: NetSuite Calls In the BOS

Feb 7





NetSuite CEO Zach Nelson Named Top 5 CRM Influencer

SAN MATEO, Calif., Feb 07, 2008 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ — NetSuite Inc. (N), a leading vendor of on-demand, integrated business management software suites that include Accounting / Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Customer Relationship Management (CRM) and Ecommerce software for small and midsized businesses and divisions of large companies, announced today that Inside CRM ranked NetSuite President and Chief Executive Officer Zach Nelson as one of the Top 5 CRM Influencers of 2007.

Mr. Nelson, along with other industry leaders including Marc Benioff of salesforce.com and Greg Gianforte of RightNow, was recognized as one who changed the CRM software landscape in 2007.

“Nelson’s advocacy for the on-demand model over the on-premise model, at a time when companies like Microsoft and Oracle are still trying to figure out how to exist with one foot in each world, bodes well for the company’s future,” said the Inside CRM article. “Nelson and Evan Goldberg [Founder and Chief Technology Officer] also clearly see the ability of CRM software to branch out into informing other aspects of a business, but they’re conservative enough to know that the time for that will not come until CRM can be a proven success with more customers.

ShareBuilder: Research News

Feb 3





Posted By Tom Sowa

Innovative banks trying to introduce phone payment systems hope the strategy makes their own card the credit card of choice, said Jim Salters, a banking industry analyst with California-based consulting company Glenbrook Partners. "People can use any one of their several cards when making payments. This is one effort [by banks] to make their card the primary one inside each person’s wallet.

When Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) introduced the iPhone last year, it was the first mass market cell phone to use a touchscreen system of controls.

Now the retail and banking industries are pushing a vastly different kind of touch technology. This year’s model is all about shopping and using a cell phone like a wand — touching the end of the phone to a checkout screen when you pay for that Big Mac.

That trend has been labeled "mobile payments," and it has just landed in Spokane, Wash., where U.S. Bank is launching its first six-month trial of cell phones that work like a credit card.

Data Exchange

The nationwide bank, using more than 100 members who have MasterCard accounts, will use the test to decide if the country is eager to embrace the use of a credit card buried inside a cell phone.

Over the past three years, banks across the world have tested "contactless" credit cards that work the same way — tapping or moving specially equipped cards near a radio-signal-sensitive payment device that records the amount of the transaction.

The technology behind the system carries the acronym of NFC, for near field communications. When two NFC devices come together — within about 4 centimeters — they exchange data via radio signals. That data can be anything from credit card numbers to instructions on how to find the nearest public transportation.

The U.S. Bank effort shows how the NFC idea has jumped from credit cards to cell phones, said Jim Salters, a banking industry analyst with California-based consulting company Glenbrook Partners.

"That’s the question everyone asks: Is this the way all the banks will eventually go, toward contactless phones?" Salters said.

Making Customers’ Lives Easier

If nothing else, the test is part of U.S. Bank’s goal of staying in touch with customers and finding ways to make their lives easier, added Dominic Venturo, a bank vice president helping manage the Spokane test project.

"Anytime you can combine the phone, which most of us have in our pockets, with the bank payment card many of us carry in our wallets, into a single system, you’ve created a simpler and easier way for your customers to manage their lives," Venturo said.

Many earlier versions of contactless cards and tap-and-go phones have been used in Japan. Other countries, including Australia and Korea, also are testing them.

U.S. Bank’s Spokane test is one of a handful of similar efforts across the country by companies looking for the same answers: Will customers like this system? Will merchants sign on and want those readers in their stores?

Too Much Information?

The answers, so far, are not clear, said Salters, who graduated from Gonzaga Preparatory School and got a degree at Princeton University. One issue will be how much information the new phones can hold, he Salters.

To date, the tests involve inserting just one credit card number inside the test phone. Over time, if banks and wireless phone companies allow customers to load the phone with multiple credit cards, or the numbers of merchant reward cards, that option might be very attractive, Salters said. However, it’s uncertain whether the banks and phone companies will give consumers those choices, he said.

About 80,000 contactless readers have been installed across the United States, according to a spokesperson with MasterCard International.

Salters said merchants consider the jury still out over the value of introducing a contactless payment system. For one, merchants know a chief goal of such NFC systems is to move customers from paying in cash to paying with a card, a transaction that costs merchants 1.5 percent to 2 percent in fees to the card company.

Primary Cards

"Merchants generally will only adopt this kind of system if it can show that it moves customers through a line quicker" or helps customers spend more money over time at that store, Salters said.

From the credit card bank perspective, one big value in developing the tap-and-go phone is creating the "top of wallet" position among a consumer’s credit cards. Industry analysts say a typical middle-class consumer has between four and six credit cards.

Salters said innovative banks trying to introduce phone payment systems hope the strategy makes their own card the credit card of choice. "People can use any one of their several cards when making payments. This is one effort (by banks) to make their card the primary one inside each person’s wallet," he said.

The other major attraction behind the marriage of cards and cell phones, Salters said, is the option of developing two-way communication with the phone user. A credit card is nothing but a card, but phones can receive text messages, tones, even short videos from marketers trying to encourage the customer to buy something.

The first versions of interactive marketing will be simple, Salters predicts. Shoppers will go to a vending machine and swipe their phone to buy something. The vending machine company will activate a message to the phone saying the shopper can get one can free can of pop with three more purchases.

Customized Coupons

Over time, the likely scenario could be a version of a plugged-in universe in which customers with cell phones are notified, because of their global positioning system location, that if they visit the nearest coffee shop they can get a double mocha on special.

"That’s not happening yet, but that is something that’s possible," Salters said.

When U.S. Bank set up the Spokane pilot program, it looked first at Spokane’s current list of merchants that use contactless readers and saw that the community had a fair share. The list includes McDonald’s, Jack in the Box, Regal Cinemas, Office Depot and 7-Eleven, Venturo said.

The bank also decided to include Gonzaga University in the test. For the six-month trial, the university agreed to equip 10 campus vending machines with new readers that will allow bank customers to try the technology.

Venturo would not say how many U.S. Bank customers are participating. "Our competitors would very much like to know that number," he said. It’s a group that is well above dozens, he noted.

To encourage them, the bank provided each with a new Nokia (NYSE: NOK)  Web-enabled phone and agreed to give each participant a monthly cash credit to be applied toward the data plan cost of their phone service. To take part, the bank member has to use either T-Mobile  or AT&T (NYSE: T)  wireless for their service.

Security Is Critical

Another incentive: At times the company will send text messages to the phones reading "if you use the card two times over the next several days, the bank will credit your account a certain amount," explained Venturo.

Security is a critical part of the system, Venturo said. First, when a phone taps a reader screen to make a payment, the transfer of data only sends encrypted credit card numbers, not the name or other personal information, he said.

If the phone is lost, the owner is subject only to the US$50 maximum amount any credit card company regards as a customer’s liability; in fact, most banks don’t even ask customers to pay back that amount.

"We’ve also made clear that if the phone is lost, that person should immediately contact U.S. Bank. We’ll have the option of disabling the secure card (inside the phone) right away," Venturo said.

The cards containing the information are also wired into the phone and can’t be easily removed. Even if removed, the information inside is indecipherable, Venturo said.

CRM News: M-Commerce: Wading Into the M-Commerce Waters

« Previous Entries Next Entries »